<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:06:28 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>BLOG</title><link>http://www.debthink.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Should scientists attack the cap and trade bill?</title><category>Congress</category><category>Hannah</category><category>James Hansen</category><category>Waxman-Markey</category><category>cap and trade</category><category>carbon tax</category><category>climate</category><category>coal</category><dc:creator>Deborah Shapley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:52:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.debthink.com/blog/2009/9/8/should-scientists-attack-the-cap-and-trade-bill.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">385758:4705387:5127124</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><em style="font-size: 90%;">June 2009</em></p>
<p>Physicist James E. Hansen is a walking, talking study in the social responsibility of scientists. He&rsquo;s chosen to act politically out of scientific conviction&mdash;a choice more US scientists will face as the political debate about climate change heats up this summer. &nbsp;Below I ask visitors to this blog if they see an analogy with the Manhattan Project scientists who campaigned for nuclear arms control after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.debthink.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-5127124.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>