<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:04:58 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>BLOG</title><subtitle>BLOG</subtitle><id>http://www.debthink.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.debthink.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.debthink.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2009-09-29T01:44:42Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Should scientists attack the cap and trade bill?</title><category term="Congress"/><category term="Hannah"/><category term="James Hansen"/><category term="Waxman-Markey"/><category term="cap and trade"/><category term="carbon tax"/><category term="climate"/><category term="coal"/><id>http://www.debthink.com/blog/2009/9/8/should-scientists-attack-the-cap-and-trade-bill.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.debthink.com/blog/2009/9/8/should-scientists-attack-the-cap-and-trade-bill.html"/><author><name>Deborah Shapley</name></author><published>2009-09-09T00:52:20Z</published><updated>2009-09-09T00:52:20Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><em style="font-size: 90%;">June 2009</em></p>
<p>Physicist James E. Hansen is a walking, talking study in the social responsibility of scientists. He&rsquo;s chosen to act politically out of scientific conviction&mdash;a choice more US scientists will face as the political debate about climate change heats up this summer. &nbsp;Below I ask visitors to this blog if they see an analogy with the Manhattan Project scientists who campaigned for nuclear arms control after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.</p>]]></summary></entry></feed>